I disapprove of what you say ...
This week Jan Moir wrote a repellant piece in the Daily Mail, suggesting that pop star Stephen Gately’s death was as a result of his gay lifestyle. It provoked a firestorm on Twitter and elsewhere. The Daily Mail, succumbing to considerable pressure, removed all comments and all advertising from the page.
One of my clients was an advertiser on that site. Its Twitter feed was inundated with tweets and retweets calling on it to withdraw advertising from the Mail.
Last week, Waitrose withdrew advertising from Fox News after a presenter made offensive comments about Barak Obama. Yet Ocado still delivers a free copy of The Times, which is owned by the same organisation.
Thing is, where do you draw the line? Personally speaking, I don’t agree with anything I read in the Daily Mail. But it is a national daily newspaper that hasn’t broken any laws. How is bullying the Daily Mail (yes, I said that. Looks weird doesn’t it?) different from Carter-Ruck trying to silence the Guardian over the equally disgraceful Trafigura affair? Because we disagree with what’s being said? The Press Complaints Commission is there to deal with that. Otherwise, despicable as Jan Moir’s piece was, in the absence of proper debate Twitter becomes a virtual baying mob, calling for rough justice as decreed by those shouting the loudest.
“I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it”
Voltaire
One of my clients was an advertiser on that site. Its Twitter feed was inundated with tweets and retweets calling on it to withdraw advertising from the Mail.
Last week, Waitrose withdrew advertising from Fox News after a presenter made offensive comments about Barak Obama. Yet Ocado still delivers a free copy of The Times, which is owned by the same organisation.
Thing is, where do you draw the line? Personally speaking, I don’t agree with anything I read in the Daily Mail. But it is a national daily newspaper that hasn’t broken any laws. How is bullying the Daily Mail (yes, I said that. Looks weird doesn’t it?) different from Carter-Ruck trying to silence the Guardian over the equally disgraceful Trafigura affair? Because we disagree with what’s being said? The Press Complaints Commission is there to deal with that. Otherwise, despicable as Jan Moir’s piece was, in the absence of proper debate Twitter becomes a virtual baying mob, calling for rough justice as decreed by those shouting the loudest.
“I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it”
Voltaire
Labels: press freedom twitter